SANDEEP @ KALA @ KALE @ SONU @ SINOTHIA vs STATE, NCT OF DELHI

Judgment text excerpt

$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 4479/2025 & CRL.M.A. 34650/2025 % Date of Decision: November 27, 2025 SANDEEP @ KALA @ KALE @ SONU @ SINOTHIA .....Applicant Through: Mr. Jitendra Sethi, Senior Advocate with Mr. Hemant Gulati and Mr. Shobit Dimri, Advs. versus STATE, NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ritesh Kumar Bahri, APP for the State with Mr. Lalit Luthra, Adv. with Insp. Sundeep Yadav, Special Cell. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN AMIT MAHAJAN, J. 1. By the present bail application, the applicant seeks interim bail for a period of six weeks in FIR No. 163/2019 dated 19.09.2019, registered at Police Station Special Cell New Delhi, for offences under Sections 3/4 of the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 (‘MCOC Act’), on the ground that his wife has to undergo surgery. 2. The Status Report has been filed, which indicates that the wife of the applicant has been diagnosed as a case of prolapsed intravertebral disc in the lumbar spine and has been advised to undergo Microdiscectomy. The surgery for the same has been Signature Not Verified Signed By:SHIKHA BAIL APPLN. 4479/2025 Page 1 of 4 SEHGAL Signing Date:27.11.2025 20:28:53 fixed for 01.12.2025. 3. The application for release of the applicant on interim bail is opposed by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor (‘APP’) for the State stating that the main accused, who is the gang leader, namely, Kapil Sangwan is still absconding after being declared as Proclaimed Offender. 4. He submits that in such circumstances, chances of the applicant also not surrendering pursuant to his release cannot be ruled out. 5. He submits that the present FIR was registered under the provisions of the MCOC Act after obtaining relevant sanction and it was found that the applicant a