S KULWANT SINGH vs RAJNI SANGWAN

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 12.11.2025 CM(M) 2154/2025, CM APPL. 70528/2025 , 70529/2025 & 70527/2025 S KULWANT SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Varun Goswami, Advocate. versus RAJNI SANGWAN .....Respondent Through: Mr. Vinit Trehan and Mr. Yash Srivastava, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA O R D E R (ORAL) 1. Petitioner/tenant/judgment debtor has assailed order dated 07.11.2025 of the learned execution court, whereby warrants of possession of the tenanted property were directed to be issued since the petitioner/tenant/judgment debtor abrogated the terms of settlement, which terms had been accepted by the coordinate bench of this court. 2. Learned counsel for respondent/landlord/decree holder appearing on advance intimation accepts notice and strongly opposes the petition. 3. I have heard learned counsel for both sides. 4. Broadly speaking, in the course of hearing of CM(M) 3774/2024, the CM(M) 2154/2025 pages 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45569 af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH 2027. b) Tenant would not create any kind of third party interest in the suit property and would keep on making the payment of “use and occupation char