RAJESH vs MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ORS

Judgment text excerpt

$~25 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 04.11.2025 + W.P.(C) 12677/2025 & CM APPL. 51717/2025 RAJESH .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Shivani Verma, Mr. Prem Shankar Jha, Mr. Piyush Singh, Ms. Arthana Brahma, Advocate for Mr. Kamlesh Kr. Mishra, Advocate versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Dushyant Yadav, Mr. Pankaj Kumar Yadav, Mr. Ravinder Kumar, Advocates for Respondent no. 3 along with respondent no. 3 in person Mob: 8968140370 Mr. Vipul Garg, Mr. Gulshan Kr. Maurya and Mr. Adarsh, Advocates for MCD Mob: 8700614239 Email: [email protected] CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA MINI PUSHKARNA, J. (ORAL): 1. A Status Report dated 02nd November, 2025 has been filed on behalf of the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (“MCD”), which reads as under: “xxx xxx xxx Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Page 1 of 6 By:HARIOM SHARMA Signing Date:05.11.2025 15:05:10 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Page 2 of 6 By:HARIOM SHARMA Signing Date:05.11.2025 15:05:10 ” 2. Perusal of the aforesaid Status Report shows that the property of the petitioner also stands booked, along with the property of respondent no. 3. 3. As per the Status Report of MCD, demolition action on the property of the petitioner, as well as respondent no. 3, has been fixed for 19th November, 2025. 4. At this stage, learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 3 has handed over a copy of the order dated 28th March, 2023 passed in W.P.(C) 10710/2019, titled as “Deepak Kumar Versus North Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr.”, and relies upon the Status Report filed on behalf of MCD in the said order. 5. By referring to the same, learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 3 submits that the subject matter of the said writ petition was property