RAJ BABBAR vs UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS & ORS.

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: 04.11.2025 Date of Decision: 13.11.2025 W.P.(CRL) 3614/2025 & CRL.M.A. 32575/2025 RAJ BABBAR .....Petitioner Through: Dr. M K Gahlaut, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Rupali Bandopadhya, ASC for State along with SI Vikash Fageria, ASI Satpal Mr. Neeraj Kumar, CGSC and Mr. Amit Acharya, GP for UOI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL JUDGMENT % 1. The present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 20231 has been filed on behalf of the petitioner seeking the following reliefs: “i. Pass a writ/order/instruction/direction in the nature of mandamus in favour of the petitioner and against the respondents thereby directing the respondents to constitute the body/committee of Retired Hon’ble High Court Judge, retired Additional commissioner of Police/Joint commissioner of Police and member 1 Hereinafter “BNSS” 2. As per the record, the petitioner claims to be a practicing Advocate at Delhi enrolled with the Bar Council of Delhi under Enrolment No. D-95/2000 and having his office at Chamber