RAJ BABBAR vs UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS & ORS.

Judgment text excerpt

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: 04.11.2025 Date of Decision: 13.11.2025 + W.P.(CRL) 3614/2025 & CRL.M.A. 32575/2025 RAJ BABBAR .....Petitioner Through: Dr. M K Gahlaut, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Rupali Bandopadhya, ASC for State along with SI Vikash Fageria, ASI Satpal Mr. Neeraj Kumar, CGSC and Mr. Amit Acharya, GP for UOI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL JUDGMENT % 1. The present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 20231 has been filed on behalf of the petitioner seeking the following reliefs: “i. Pass a writ/order/instruction/direction in the nature of mandamus in favour of the petitioner and against the respondents thereby directing the respondents to constitute the body/committee of Retired Hon’ble High Court Judge, retired Additional commissioner of Police/Joint commissioner of Police and member 1 Hereinafter “BNSS” Signature Not Verified Signed By:SHILPI W.P.(CRL) 3614/2025 Page 1 of 9 Signing Date:14.11.2025 16:38:42 of National Human Right Commission to conduct the inquiry in respect of six police officials whose identity is clear and two other police officials whose identity are in knowledge of six police officials as mentioned above on the complaint dated 06.10.2025 of the petitioner. ii. Pass a writ/order/instruction/direction in the nature of mandamus in favour of the petitioner and against the respondents thereby directing the respondents to constitute the body/committee of Retired Hon’ble High Court Judge, retired Additional commissioner of Police/Joint commissioner of Police and member of National Human Right Commission to conduct the inquiry in respect of conduct of S.H.