PUNNET KAPOOR vs THE SATTE & ANR

Judgment text excerpt

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on: 23rd September, 2025 Pronounced on: 18th November, 2025 + CRL.M.C. 1747/2018, CRL.M.A. 6267/2018 PUNEET KAPOOR S/o Shri K.K. Kapoor R/o 6/55, Subhash Nagar, New Delhi. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Anand, Adv. versus 1. THE STATE (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) 2. SMT. MADHU ARORA W/o Shri Praveen Arora R/o H.No.B-652, Sector-1, Avantika, Rohini, Delhi. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ajay Vikram Singh, APP for State with Inspector Pushpendra. Mr. Pramod Bahuguna, Mr. Anurag Jain and Ms. Yachi. Advs. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA J U D G M E N T NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J. 1. Petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as “Cr.P.C.”) on behalf of the Petitioner/Puneet Kapoor challenging the Order dated 08.09.2017 of Ld. ASJ-03, Delhi in Criminal Revision Petition No. 141/2017 filed by the Petitioner, upholding the summoning Order dated 17.01.2017 by the Ld. CRL.M.C. 1747/2018 Page 1 of 20 Signature Not Verified Signed By:VIKAS ARORA Signing Date:19.11.2025 12:06:29 M.M. (Mahila Court) NW, Delhi in FIR No. 47/2014, P.S. Rani Bagh whereby Cognizance of the offence was taken and summons issued to accused persons/Petitioner. 2. The FIR No. 47/2014 was registered under Section 506/509 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as “IPC”) and Section 67 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as “IT Act”) on 17.01.2014 at P.S. Rani Bagh. Section 354 IPC was added in the FIR consequently. 3. Briefly stated, the Complainant/Respondent No. 2, i.e. Ms. Madhu Arora in her complaint dated 30.12.2013 has submitted that she has been working for nearly eight years with M/s Bluestar Infotech Pvt. Ltd. She was allotted a sepa