PULAK M. PANDEY vs INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY DELHI & ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 18th November, 2025 LPA 284/2024 PULAK M. PANDEY .....Appellant Through: Mr. Sahil Khurana, Adv. versus INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Arjun Mitra, Adv. Ms. Aanchal Tikmani, Adv. for R4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIMAL KUMAR YADAV ORDER (ORAL) DINESH MEHTA, J. 1. The LPA 284/2024 at hand, has been filed by the Appellant inter alia impugning the order/judgment dated 15.12.2023, whereby writ petition filed by the Appellant has been rejected by the learned Single Judge observing thus: “The writ of certiorari cannot be issued in the present matter since for the issue of such writ, there should be an error apparent on the face of it or goes to the root of the matter. However, no such circumstances are present in the instant petition.” 2. Learned counsel for the Respondent at the outset submitted that after providing full opportunity and following principles of natural justice in a domestic inquiry relating to the case of sexual harassment, a censure was 3. He then preferred a writ petition before learned Single Judge of this Court, which too has been rej