Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-11-11

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. 950 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. 950 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. 950 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 950 of 2025 Sarvesh Kumar .....Petitioner(s) Versus State of U.P. and 2 others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manoj Kumar, Girish Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : Jagdish Pathak, S.C., Saurabh Singh, Deepak Prajapati, Suresh Kumar Maurya Chief Justice's Court HON'BLE ARUN BHANSALI, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE KSHITIJ SHAILENDRA, J. 1. This petition, purportedly in public interest, has been filed by the petitioner seeking a direction to the respondents to take appropriate decision on the report submitted by the Lokayukt, Uttar Pradesh dated 05.11.2024. 2. Submissions have been made that despite the Lokayukt forwarding the inquiry report pertaining to respondent no. 3, no action has been initiated by the respondents and, therefore, the respondents may be directed to take steps in this regard. 3. Counsel appearing for respondent no. 3 contested the credentials of the petitioner on the ground that the petitioner was a rival candidate at the elections and on account of loosing the same, attempts are being made to discredit the respondent no. 3. 4. Instructions have been produced by learned Standing

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. 950 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam