Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-11-18

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. 8028 of 2019 at Lucknow

Citation / case number
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. 8028 of 2019 at Lucknow
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. 8028 of 2019 at Lucknow
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 8028 of 2019 Achyutanand Pathak .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Energy And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Raj Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Aprajita Bansal, Neerav Chitravanshi Court No. - 1 HON'BLE RAJAN ROY, J. HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J. 1. Heard. 2. This petition was filed as a PIL in 2019 seeking quashing of Clause 3 of the impugned advertisement dated 5.3.2019. 3. The advertisement was in relation to engagement of panel lawyers for the Madhyanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited. Clause 3 imposes a condition that the advocate applying for being empanelled should be an income tax payer and should have annual income of Rs. 5 lakhs for Panel advocate and Rs. 7 lakhs for the Standing Counsel. 4. The Standing Counsel informed that in 2020, fresh guidelines were framed and lawyers have been engaged accordingly. 5. In view of the aforesaid, the petition is dismissed. (Rajeev Bharti,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) November 18, 2025 Shravan Digitally signed by :- SHRAVAN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. 8028 of 2019 at Lucknow · Niyam