Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-11-12

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. 23618 of 2018 at Lucknow

Citation / case number
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. 23618 of 2018 at Lucknow
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. 23618 of 2018 at Lucknow
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 23618 of 2018 Prem Shanker Pandey .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Urban Planning And Development And Ors .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : P.S.Pandey In Person Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Abhinav Singh, Amit Kumar Dwivedi, Arjun Gupta, Ashok Kumar Shukla, Jyotsana Singh, Ratnesh Chandra, Samidha, Shaliendra Singh Chauhan, Sunil Kumar Mishra Court No. - 1 HON'BLE RAJAN ROY, J. HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J. 1. Heard. 2. After hearing the matter at length, what comes out is that long back there was some encroachment near the gate of SGPGI and there was also some obstruction of traffic, etc. on account of encroachments, but as of now, there is no encroachment and another gate has also been opened for accessing SGPGI. As regards the alleged encroachment by some shopkeepers, some proceedings have taken place and according to petitioner appearing in person even after dismissal of revision, the demolition orders have not been carried out. However, Shri Ratnesh Chandra, learned counsel for LDA states that by the revisional order the matter was remanded and the matter is

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. 23618 of 2018 at Lucknow · Niyam