Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-11-04

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. 1125 of 2025 at Lucknow

Citation / case number
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. 1125 of 2025 at Lucknow
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. 1125 of 2025 at Lucknow
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 1125 of 2025 Anshu Pal .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Panchayati Raj Deptt. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anoop Vajpayee, Atul Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Dilip Kumar Pandey Court No. - 1 HON'BLE RAJAN ROY, J. HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J. 1. Heard. 2. Learned Additional C.S.C. says that the preliminary inquiry has been instituted on the complaint of the petitioner under Rule 3 of the U.P. Panchayat Raj (Removal of Pradhans, Up-Pradhans and Members) Enquiry Rules, 1997 read with Section 95(1)(g) of the U.P. Panchayat Raj Act, 1947. 3. If being so, the same will have to be taken to its logical conclusion as per law. 4. We are not inclined to examine the issue any further in the present writ petition. 5. The writ petition is disposed of. (Rajeev Bharti,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) November 4, 2025 Arti/- Digitally signed by :- ARTI MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. 1125 of 2025 at Lucknow · Niyam