Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-11-13

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. 1100 of 2025 at Lucknow

Citation / case number
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. 1100 of 2025 at Lucknow
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. 1100 of 2025 at Lucknow
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 1100 of 2025 Phool Chandra .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Revenue Sectt. Lko. And 8 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anil Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh Court No. - 20 HON'BLE SYED QAMAR HASAN RIZVI, J. 1. Heard Sri Anil Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner; Sri Suresh Chandra Kushwaha, learned Standing Counsel for the State-opposite party nos.1 to 3 and Sri Mohan Singh, learned counsel for the Gaon Sabha-opposite party no.4. 2. Sri Arpit Verma, Advocate has filed his Vakaltnama on behalf of opposite party nos.5 to 8. The same is taken on record. 3. At the very outset, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State- opposite parties has raised a preliminary objection regarding the maintainability of the present Public Interest Litigation as the petitioner has not disclosed the credentials and other details that are required under Sub-Rule (3-A) of Rule 1 of Chapter XXII of the Allahabad High Court Rules (Rules of the Court) 1952, which has been amended in the light of judgment passed by the H

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. 1100 of 2025 at Lucknow · Niyam