PERPETUAL VISION LLP & ANR. vs VAIBHAV S PINGALE & ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO (COMM) 316/2025 and CM APPLs. 69747-748/2025 PERPETUAL VISION LLP & ANR. .....Appellants Through: Mr. Anshuman Upadhyay, Mr. Naseem Sheikh, Mr. Rahul Singh, Ms Shubhangi Shaswat, Advocates versus VAIBHAV S PINGALE & ORS. .....Respondents Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA JUDGMENT (ORAL) % 13.11.2025 C. HARI SHANKAR, J. 1. This appeal under Section 13 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 is directed against the following order passed by the learned District Judge (Commercial Court)-01, Saket. “03.11.2025 Present : Counsel for plaintiff, Sh. Naseem and Sh. Rahul Singh. Submission heard. Record perused. Summons of the suit as well as notice to the application U/o 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC be issued to the defendants on taking steps within a week by all permissible modes including electronic mode, returnable by 19.11.2025. For service to be affected through electronic mode i.e. Whats App, e-mail address etc. of defendant, affidavit with regard to correctness of the same, be filed on record. 2. We have heard Mr. Anshuman Upadhyay, learned counsel for the appellants at length on whether such an