Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-11-27

NIKITA JAIN ALIAS NIKKI JAIN & ANR. vs RAM PHAL ALIAS RAM PAL AND ANR

Citation / case number
CM(M)-2292/2025 2025:DHC:10527
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
NIKITA JAIN ALIAS NIKKI JAIN & ANR.
Respondent
RAM PHAL ALIAS RAM PAL AND ANR
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 27.11.2025 CM(M) 2292/2025, CM APPL. 74340/2025 & CM APPL. 74339/2025 NIKITA JAIN ALIAS NIKKI JAIN & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Biraja Mahapatra, Mr. S. K. Jain, Mr. Nalin Hingorani and Mr. Abhay Singh, Advocates. versus RAM PHAL ALIAS RAM PAL AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Mukesh Anand, Advocate for R- 2. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA O R D E R (ORAL) 1. Petitioners/plaintiffs have assailed order dated 15.10.2025 of the learned trial court, whereby their application under Order XVIII Rule 17 CPC was dismissed. Having heard learned counsel for petitioners/plaintiffs, I do not find it a fit case to even issue notice, though learned counsel for respondent no.2 is present in court on advance intimation. 2. Broadly speaking, the circumstances relevant for present purposes are as follows. 2.1 The petitioners/plaintiffs filed a suit for decree of declaration that the registered sale deed executed by defendant no.1 (the present respondent no.1) in favour of defendant no.2 (the present respondent no.2) is null and CM(M) 2292/2025 pages 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45569 af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HI