NAVEEN KUMAR vs SUNIL KUMAR

Judgment text excerpt

$~44 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 17.11.2025 + CM(M) 2189/2025 & CM APPL. 71696/2025 NAVEEN KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Amit Kumar Jain, Advocate versus SUNIL KUMAR .....Respondent Through: None CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA O R D E R (ORAL) 1. Petitioner/Judgment Debtor has assailed order dated 09.10.2025 of the learned execution court, whereby warrants of arrest against him were ordered returnable on 14.11.2025. It is informed by learned counsel for petitioner/Judgment Debtor that on 14.11.2025 also, fresh arrest warrants have been ordered returnable on 06.12.2025. Having heard learned counsel for petitioner/Judgment Debtor, I do not find it a fit case to even issue notice. 2. The impugned order deals with an objection of the petitioner/Judgment Debtor as regards territorial jurisdiction of the execution court. 3. It is contended by learned counsel for petitioner/Judgment Debtor that CM(M) 2189/2025 Page 1 of 3 pages Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, GIRISH 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4af ec45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacc a, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - Digitally Signed KATHPALIA 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d By:NEETU N NAIR 15570996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965f f801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2025.11.17 17:38:47 -08'00' Signing Date:17.11.2025 17:43:34 the execution court of Shahdara District has no territorial jurisdiction to deal with the subject execution proceedings because the petitioner/Judgment Debtor is residing in Karawal Nagar, which falls under the jurisdiction of North-East District. No other objection has been raised. 4. Admittedly, and as noted in the impugned order, when the execution petition was fil