NAVED & ORS. vs REHANA

Judgment text excerpt

$~18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:19thNovember, 2025 + CRL.M.C. 1515/2017, CRL.M.A. 6184/2017 (stay) 1. NAVED 2. MUBIN Both sons of Late Shri Babuddin 3. SMT. ZUMRUD W/o Late Shri Babuddin 4. MS. ZAKRA D/o Late Shri Babuddin Elhi 5. MOHD. NAEEM S/o Late Shri Babuddin All R/o 99, Chhata Lal Mian, Darya Ganj, New Delhi. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Diwan Singh Chauhan and Mr. Viplav Rawat, Advocates. versus REHANA W/o Late Swaleen R/o 98 Chhata Lal Mian, Darya Ganj, New Delhi. .....Respondent Through: Mr. M.Tabish Zia, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA Signature Not Verified CRL.M.C. 1515/2017 Page 1 of 11 Digitally Signed By:ANIL KUMAR BHATT Signing Date:28.11.2025 15:05:50 J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as “Cr.P.C”) on behalf of the Petitioners/Naved, Mubin, Smt. Zumrud, Ms. Zakra, Mohd. Naeem for setting aside of the Order dated 25.01.2017 of Ld. Special Judge, Delhi in CR No. 09/2016 titled “Naved vs. Rehana” who upheld the summoning Order dated 24.05.2016 vide which the Petitioners were summoned under Section 323/341/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as “IPC”). 2. The brief facts are that a Complaint under Section 200 Cr.P.C was filed under Section 323/341/506/34 IPC by the Respondent/Rehana against the Petitioners wherein it was alleged that on 11.10.2015, at about 11:30 AM, the Respondent/Complainant along with her son, Mohd. Amir was going to their house after purchasing some vegetables from Subzi Mandi, Darya Ganj, Delhi. When they reached near Golcha Cinema, Darya Ganj, Delhi, they both saw that the accused persons i.e. the Petitioner were waiting for them. Thereafter, on the directions