MOHSIN AHMAD vs STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI)

Judgment text excerpt

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:12.11.2025 + CRL.A. 807/2016 MOHSIN AHMAD .....Appellant Through: Mr. Amit Kumar and Ms. Khushboo, Advocates with appellant in person. versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr Pradeep Gahalot, APP for State with SI Johny Kumar PS Uttam Nagar, New Delhi(M:8447576757). + CRL.A. 810/2016 NEELAM .....Appellant Through: Mr. Amit Kumar and Ms. Khushboo, Advocates with appellant in person. versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr Pradeep Gahalot, APP for State with SI Johny Kumar PS Uttam Nagar, New Delhi(M:8447576757). CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. By way of the present appeals, the appellants assail the judgment of conviction dated 29.07.2016 and the order on sentence dated 30.07.2016 passed by the learned ASJ-05 (West), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in Sessions Case No. 64/15 (Old No. 19/12), arising out of FIR No. 199/2010 registered at P.S. Uttam Nagar under Sections 452/308/34 IPC. By the impugned Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:NIJAMUDDEEN ANSARI CRL.APPEALS 807/2016, 810/2016 Page 1 of 8 Signing Date:17.11.2025 16:35:39 judgment, both appellants along with the co-accused Zamil Ahmad, were held guilty of offences punishable under Sections 308/34 and 451/34 IPC. 2. Vide the order on sentence, all three convicts, including the present appellants, were sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of three years with fine of Rs. 20,000/- each, and in default of payment of fine, to further undergo simple imprisonment for six months, for the offence under Section 308/34 IPC. They were further sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years with fine of Rs. 1,000/- each, and in default to undergo simple imprisonme