MOHD. RASHID & ORS. vs THE STATE (GOVT. OFNCT OF DELHI) & ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

$~52 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: 18.11.2025 ,,,,,,,,,, + CRL.M.C.8182/2025 & CRL.M.A. 34206/2025 EXEMPTION FROM FILING TRANSLATION MOHD. RASHID & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Navdeep Suhag, Adv. with petitioner no. 1 and 2 in person. Petitioner no. 3 through VC. versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Satinder Singh Bawa, APP with SI Kuldeep Lamba, PS Amar Colony. Respondent no. 2 in person. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA JUDGMENT(ORAL) RAVINDER DUDEJA, J. 1. This is a petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, seeking quashing of FIR No. 29/2024, dated 27.01.2024, registered at P.S Amar Colony, Delhi under Sections 308/34 IPC and all proceedings emanating therefrom on the basis of settlement between the parties. 2. At the very outset, the Ld. Counsel who appears for the petitioners submits that there is a typographical mistake in the number CRL.M.C. 8182/2025 Page 1 of 4 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:VAISHALI PRUTHI Signing Date:18.11.2025 18:37:07 of FIR in the title of the petition as also in the prayer para, inasmuch as the correct FIR no. is 29/2024 and not 24/2024 as recorded therein. 3. The submission made is taken on record. 4. As per averments made in the FIR, on 24.01.2024 around 9:15 PM, respondent no. 2/complainant over an argument with petitioner no. 2, petitioner no. 1 & petitioner no. 2 physically assaulted him with a rolling pin while petitioner no. 3 restrained him. FIR No. 29/2024 was lodged at the instance of Respondent no. 2 under Sections 308/34 IPC against the petitioners. 5. During the course of proceedings, the parties amicably resolved their disputes and the terms of the compromise were reduced into writing in the fo