Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-11-03

MOHD ARIF vs AMIT CHAUDHARY & ANR.

Citation / case number
RC.REV.-270/2024 2025:DHC:9585
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
MOHD ARIF
Respondent
AMIT CHAUDHARY & ANR.
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: October 10, 2025 % Pronounced on: November 03, 2025 RC.REV. 270/2024, CM APPL. 58529/2024 MOHD ARIF .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Amit Gupta, Mr. Amit Bhasin, Mr. Kshitij Vaibhav, Ms. Muskan Nagpal and Mr. H.S. Mahapatra, Advocates. Versus AMIT CHAUDHARY & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Digvijay Singh Jaswal, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE JUDGMENT 1. The respondents/ landlords1 filed an Eviction Petition under Section 14(1)(e) read with Section 25B of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958,2 entitled ‘Amit Chaudhary & Anr. vs. Mohd. Arif’ being RC ARC 749/19 before the learned CCJ/ ARC (West) Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi3, seeking eviction of the petitioner/ tenant4 from the tenanted shop(s), i.e., two shops on the ground floor of the built-up property bearing no. 5689 (New) and 7586, 7587 (Old) situated at Gali Hanuman Mandir (Sholal), Factory Road, Nabi Karim, Paharganj, Delhi-110 0555, on the grounds of bona 1 Hereinafter referred to as “landlord” 2 Hereinafter referred to as “DRC Act” 3 Hereinafter referred to as “learned ARC” 4 Hereinafter referred to as “tenant” 5 Hereinafter referred to as “subject premis