Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-11-22

MANBHARAN SINGH YADAV vs DAINICHI CONSULTANT INC. AND ANR.

Citation / case number
ARB.P.-1390/2025 2025:DHC:10664
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
MANBHARAN SINGH YADAV
Respondent
DAINICHI CONSULTANT INC. AND ANR.
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

$-25 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ARB.P. 1390/2025 Date of Decision: 22.11.2025 IN THE MATTER OF: MANBHARAN SINGH YADAV WARD NO-20, NEAR TOURIST CAFÉ, JHANSI ROAD NOWGONG, DISTRICT CHATTARPUR, MADHYA PRADESH-471201 ..... PETITIONER Through: Mr. Vishwa Aman Kandwal, Advocate. Versus DAINICHI CONSULTANT INC. THROUGH ITS DIRECTORS HAVING ITS REGD. OFFICE AT 3-1-21 YABUTA MINAMI, GIFU CITY, GIFU 5008348, JAPAN-4 ALSO AT A-104, SHAURYA APARTMENT, B9/7B, SECTOR 62, NOIDA SECTOR 34, GAUTAM BUDDHA NAGAR, DADRI, UTTAR PRADESH, INDIA, 201307 MR. RAJESH KUMAR KHANKA AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE DAINICHI CONSULTANT INC. A-104, SHAURYA APARTMENT, B9/7B, SECTOR 62, NOIDA SECTOR 34, GAUTAM BUDDHA NAGAR, DADRI, UTTAR PRADESH, 1. The present petition has been filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter “the Act”), seeking appointment of an Arbitrator, to adjudicate upon the disputes that have arisen between the parties under Professional Service Agreement dated 15.01.2025 (hereinafter “the Agreement”). 2. The case of the petitioner is that he was engaged by the respondent for his services as an Assistant Resident Engineer for a period of forty-eigh

MANBHARAN SINGH YADAV vs DAINICHI CONSULTANT INC. AND ANR. · Niyam