Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2025

Bombay High Court · 2025-11-03

M3NERGY SDN. BHD. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS M3NERGY BERHAD) vs HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD AND ANR

Citation / case number
CARBP/1101/2018
Court
Bombay High Court
Petitioner
M3NERGY SDN. BHD. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS M3NERGY BERHAD)
Respondent
HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD AND ANR
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CARBP.548.2014.docx IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 548 OF 2014 M3nergy SDN. BHD. …Petitioner Versus Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. Prize Petroleum Company Ltd. & Anr …Respondents WITH COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 76 OF 2018 M3nergy SDN. BHD. …Petitioner (Formerly known as Trenergy/ M3nergy Berhad) Versus Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. & Anr …Respondents WITH COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 1101 OF 2018 M3nergy SDN. BHD. …Petitioner (Formerly known as Trenergy/ M3nergy Berhad) Versus Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. & Anr …Respondents Dr. Rishab Gupta a/w Kanika Goenka,Shreya Jain, Swagata Ghosh, Sanjana Kattoor, i/b Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co., for the Petitioner. 1. This Petition is filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“the Act”) challenging an arbitral award titled ‘partial award’ dated January 9, 2014 (“ Impugned Award”) passed unanimously by a three-member arbitral tribunal, returning a fundamental finding that a Joint Executing Agreement (“ JEA”) that had been initialled by the parties (but not formally signed and executed) was validly in e