Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-11-20

M/S. JAGAT SINGH GURCHARAN SINGH(GURCHARAN SINGH DECEASED) THROUGH PARTNER SMT. SURINDER KAUR vs SAURABH ARORA AND ORS

Citation / case number
RC.REV.-218/2023 2025:DHC:10339
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
M/S. JAGAT SINGH GURCHARAN SINGH(GURCHARAN SINGH DECEASED) THROUGH PARTNER SMT. SURINDER KAUR
Respondent
SAURABH ARORA AND ORS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: November 20, 2025 RC.REV. 218/2023, CM APPL. 44255/2023, CM APPL. 47982/2024, CM APPL. 56804/2024, CM APPL. 74613/2024, CM APPL. 7019/2025, CM APPL. 66423/2025 M/S. JAGAT SINGH GURCHARAN SINGH(GURCHARAN SINGH DECEASED) THROUGH PARTNER SMT. SURINDER KAUR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Amit Saxena, Mr. Ritesh Tanwar and Ms. Alkesh, Advs. versus SAURABH ARORA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Ms.Niharika Ahluwalia and Ms. Sonoakshi Chaturvedi, Advs. for R1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. The respondent no.1/ landlord1 filed an Eviction Petition under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 19582 before the learned Administrative Civil Judge-cum-Additional Rent Controller (Central), Delhi3 seeking eviction of the petitioner/ tenant4 from Shop No. 513, Ground Floor, Main Sadar Bazar, Delhi-110 0065. 2. Succinctly put, it was the case of the landlord before learned ARC that being one of the co-owners of the tenanted shop, he was in bona fide requirement thereof, particularly since he had left his earlier private job in 1 Hereinafter referred to as ‘landlady’ 2 Hereinafter referred to