M/S BLUSPRING ENTERPRISES LTD vs LOTUS BOULEVARD APARTMENT OWNERS ASSOCIATION

Judgment text excerpt

$-18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ARB.P. 1203/2025 Date of Decision: 22.11.2025 IN THE MATTER OF: M/S BLUSPRING ENTERPRISES LTD REGISTERED OFFICE ADDRESS: 3/3/2 BELLANDUR GATE, SAIJAPUR ROAD, BENGALURU-560103, KARNATAKA, INDIA ..... PETITIONER Through: Ms. Kriti Handa, Advocate. Versus LOTUS BOULEVARD APARTMENT OWNERS ASSOCIATION REGISTERED OFFICE AT PLOT NO. GH 03, SECTOR 100, NOIDA, GAUTUM BUDHA NAGAR, UTTAR PRADESH, 201301 .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rohan Sharma, Advocate. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV JUDGEMENT PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J. (ORAL) 1. The present petition has been filed under Section 11(5) and 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter “the Act”), seeking appointment of an Arbitrator, to adjudicate upon the disputes that have arisen between the parties under Service Agreement dated 02.09.2021 (hereinafter “the Agreement”). Signature Not Verified Signature Not Verified Signed By:NEHA CHOPRA Signed Signing Date:28.11.2025 By:PURUSHAINDRA 13:20:49 1 KUMAR KAURAV 2. The case of the petitioner is that its predecessor company M/s Quess Corp Ltd (from which the petitioner was demerged) entered into the Agreement with the respondent, whereunder, the former was to provide services such as housekeeping, horticultural, and security services to the latter at its premises. The Agreement, initially, was to be operative till 16.05.2022. However, upon a request by the respondent vide letter dated 15.05.2022, the validity of the Agreement was extended till a new agency was engaged by the respondent for the aforesaid services. The plaintiff claims that due to a revision of the rate of minimum wages by the appropriate authority, the petitioner sought revision of the consideration for its services as per the terms o