KEWAL SADANA AND ORS vs ITQ TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD

Judgment text excerpt

$~69 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 26.11.2025 + CM(M) 2275/2025, CM APPL. 73956/2025 & CM APPL. 73955/2025 KEWAL SADANA AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Rakesh Patiyal, Advocate (through videoconferencing) versus ITQ TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD .....Respondent Through: None. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA O R D E R (ORAL) 1. Matter taken up today as 25.11.2025 was declared a holiday on account of Guru Teg Bahadur’s Martyrdom Day. 2. Petitioners/defendants have assailed order dated 01.08.2025 of the learned commercial court, whereby application of the present petitioners no. 1 & 2 for being deleted from array of parties was dismissed. Having heard learned counsel for petitioners/defendants, I do not find it a fit case to even issue notice. 3. Broadly speaking, the contention raised by the petitioners is that the entire transaction in question took place only with the petitioner no. 3 company and role of the petitioners no. 1 & 2 is only to the extent that they CM(M) 2275/2025 Page 1 of 3 pages Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA Signature Not Verified GIRISH DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afe c45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, KATHPALIA postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d1 Digitally Signed 5570996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff8 01e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2025.11.26 17:50:22 -08'00' By:NEETU N NAIR Signing Date:26.11.2025 18:13:22 are Directors/shareholders in the petitioner no.3 company. The impugned order is based on the specific averments in pleadings, especially paragraphs 3, 5 and 8 of the plaint. The learned trial court has also made a reference to the judgment of a coordinate bench of this court in the case of Tristar Consult