KANHAIYA LAL THROUGH SPA HOLDER vs DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS. & ORS.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on: 18.11.2025 Judgment delivered on: 26.11.2025 LPA 1092/2024, CM APPL. 64384/2024, CM APPL. 64385/2024 & CM APPL. 64387/2024 KANHAIYA LAL THROUGH SPA HOLDER .....Appellant versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS .....Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant: Mr. Sanjay Goel, Advocate For the Respondents: Ms. Kritika Gupta and Ms. Vidushi Singhania, Advocates for DDA. Ms. Nidhi Raman, CGSC with Mr. Mayank Sansanwal, Mr. Akash Mittal and Mr. Om Ram, Advocates for R-2 & 3/UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA JUDGMENT TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J. 1. The present Letters Patent Appeal has been preferred assailing the impugned judgment and order dated 28.08.2024 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.(C) 10311/2019 titled “Kanhaiya Lal vs. Delhi Development Authority and Ors.” dismissing the said writ petition imposing costs of Rs.50,000/-. 2. Shorn off of all unnecessary details, it is to be noticed that when the 2019. The said writ petition was dismissed vide the impugned judgment dated 28.08.2024 with costs of Rs.50,000/- constraining the appellant to prefer the