IMRAN KHAN vs STATE (NCT OF DELHI)

Judgment text excerpt

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: 10.11.2025 % Pronounced on: 11.11.2025 + CRL.A.1050/2019 IMRAN KHAN .....Appellant Through: Mr Sabyasachi Mishra and Mr Frankey Sharma, Advocates Versus STATE (NCTOF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr Pradeep Gahalot, APP for State with SI Shubham, P.S. Maurya Enclave CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI JUDGMENT 1. The subject appeal seeks to assail the judgment of conviction dated 11.07.2019 rendered by the Sessions Court for the trial conducted in the context of FIR No.466/2010 registered under Sections 392/34/394/397/411 IPC and 27 of the Arms Act. 2. The appellant was found guilty and convicted. He was to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment (RI) for 3 years and fine of Rs.2,000/- for offence punishable under Section 392/34 IPC and in default thereof, Simple Imprisonment (SI) for two months; RI for 3 years and fine of Rs.2,000/- for offence under Section 394 IPC and in default thereof, SI for two months; SI for 2 years and fine of Rs.2,000/- for offence under Section 411 and in default SI for two months; RI for a period of 7 years and fine of Rs.2,000/- for offence punishable under Section 397 IPC and in default, SI for two Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed CRL.A.1050/2019 Page 1 of 9 By:NIJAMUDDEE N ANSARI months. All sentences were to run concurrently. Benefit of Section 428 CrPC was also extended to the appellant. The sentence of the appellant was suspended by this Court on 18.05.2020. Pertinently, the appellant was tried along with co-accused Harun Pasa @ Saleem, who also stands convicted vide the impugned judgment. 3. FIR was registered in the context of an incident that occurred on 26.11.2010 at around 9.00-9.15 PM in which the complainant has alleged that while he was about to sit along with his wi