DEEPAK YADAV vs THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

$~23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: 14.11.2025 ,,,,,,,,,, + CRL.M.C.8049/2025 DEEPAK YADAV .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Dewan Singh, Advocate. Petitioner in person. versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. … Respondents Through: Mr. Satinder Singh Bawa, APP with SI Dilsukh, PS-Begumpur. Mr. B.P. Singh, Advocate for R-2 with R-2 in person. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA JUDGMENT(ORAL) RAVINDER DUDEJA, J. 1. This is a petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, seeking quashing of FIR No. 566/2025, dated 10.09.2025, registered at P.S Begampur, District Rohini, Delhi under Sections 3(i)(r)(s) of Schedule Castes And The Schedule Tribes (Prevention of ATRO.) Amendment Act, 2015 and all proceedings emanating therefrom on the basis of settlement between the parties. 2. As per averments made in the FIR, Respondent no.2/ complainant was subjected to caste-based abuses and threats by petitioner who hired him on 04.05.2024 to construct a three-storey CRL.M.C.8049/2025 Page 1 of 4 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:VAISHALI PRUTHI Signing Date:15.11.2025 11:04:56 godown but later failed to pay the remaining ₹3,66,200/- after completion in May 2025. FIR No. 566/2025 was lodged at the instance of respondent no. 2 under Sections 3(i)(r)(s) of Schedule Castes And The Schedule Tribes (Prevention of ATRO.) Amendment Act, 2015 against the petitioner. 3. During the course of proceedings, the parties amicably resolved their disputes and the terms of the compromise were reduced into writing in the form of a Mutual Settlement Cum Compromise dated 09.10.2025, copy of which has been annexed as Annexure P-3. 4. Parties are physically present before the Court. They have been identified by their respective counsels as wel