Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-11-27

CYBERSEC INFORMATICS vs AVION NETWORK

Citation / case number
CM(M)-2289/2025 2025:DHC:10518
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
CYBERSEC INFORMATICS
Respondent
AVION NETWORK
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 27.11.2025 CM(M) 2289/2025, CM APPL. 74327/2025 & 74326/2025 CYBERSEC INFORMATICS .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Swapnil Gupta, Mr. Vibhash Jha and Mr. Umesh Kumar Burnwal, Advocates. versus AVION NETWORK .....Respondent Through: Ms. Anisha Mathur, Mr. Rahul Kumar and Ms. Himani Kalra, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA O R D E R (ORAL) 1. Petitioner/defendant has assailed order dated 11.11.2025 of the learned trial court, whereby the amendment application of respondent/plaintiff was allowed. 2. At the outset, learned counsel for petitioner/defendant contends that his challenge to the impugned order is confined to the denial of the opportunity to file Written Statement to the amended plaint. CM(M) 2289/2025 pages 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec4556 9af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, 3. Learned counsel for respondent/plaintiff appearing on advance intimation accepts notice and in all fairness does not object to the opportunity to be granted to the petitioner/defendant to file Written Statement to the amended plaint, of course without inserting any new facts. 4. Further, learned