CYBERSEC INFORMATICS vs AVION NETWORK

Judgment text excerpt

$~59 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 27.11.2025 + CM(M) 2289/2025, CM APPL. 74327/2025 & 74326/2025 CYBERSEC INFORMATICS .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Swapnil Gupta, Mr. Vibhash Jha and Mr. Umesh Kumar Burnwal, Advocates. versus AVION NETWORK .....Respondent Through: Ms. Anisha Mathur, Mr. Rahul Kumar and Ms. Himani Kalra, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA O R D E R (ORAL) 1. Petitioner/defendant has assailed order dated 11.11.2025 of the learned trial court, whereby the amendment application of respondent/plaintiff was allowed. 2. At the outset, learned counsel for petitioner/defendant contends that his challenge to the impugned order is confined to the denial of the opportunity to file Written Statement to the amended plaint. CM(M) 2289/2025 Page 1 of 2 pages Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA GIRISH DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec4556 9af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, Digitally Signed KATHPALIA postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d15570 996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e26fa, By:NEETU N NAIR cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2025.11.27 17:31:59 -08'00' Signing Date:27.11.2025 18:22:21 3. Learned counsel for respondent/plaintiff appearing on advance intimation accepts notice and in all fairness does not object to the opportunity to be granted to the petitioner/defendant to file Written Statement to the amended plaint, of course without inserting any new facts. 4. Further, learned counsel for petitioner/defendant submits that the trial court be also directed to frame additional issue after the Written Statement to the amended plaint is filed. But that would be completely within the domain of the learned trial cour