Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-11-26

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 9245 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 9245 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 9245 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9245 of 2025 Mahipal Alias Chauhanni .....Applicant(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rajesh Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 68 HON'BLE ASHUTOSH SRIVASTAVA, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Puneet Kumar Singh, learned AGA for the State-Respondent and perused the record. The present bail application has been moved on behalf of accused-applicant seeking enlargement on bail in Case Crime No. 163 of 2024, under Sections 377, 506 of IPC and Section 5(M), (L)/6 of the POCSO Act, Police Station Baradari, District Bareilly. Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the accused-applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case crime number. Learned counsel for the applicant further submits that the applicant has neither enticed away the son of the informant nor he has committed unnatural sex with him. He submits that there is no independent witness of the alleged incident. There is variation in the statement of the witness recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C. and Section 164 Cr.P.C., which belies the pros

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 9245 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam