Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-11-06

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 5988 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 5988 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 5988 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 5988 of 2025 Chandrabhan .....Applicant(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ashish Kumar, Rakesh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 65 HON'BLE DR. GAUTAM CHOWDHARY, J. 1. As per office report dated 23.07.2025, notice issued to the first informant of the case has been served personally but no one has put in appearance on behalf of the first informant, inspite of revision of list. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. Learned counsel further submits that the applicant was named in the F.I.R. and that the victim in her statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C., has levelled allegation of rape against the applicant and the co-accused Shani. He further submits that Shubham and Shani are the same and one person. Learned counsel further argued that the role assigned to the co-accused Shubham and the applicant is the same and that accused Shubham has already be

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 5988 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam