Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-11-15

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 40104 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 40104 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 40104 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 40104 of 2025 Yogesh .....Applicant(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Janardan Prasad Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Anil Kumar Tiwari, G.A. Court No. - 65 HON'BLE DR. GAUTAM CHOWDHARY, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant and perused the material brought on record. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the F.I.R. was lodged by the informant in unknown with the allegation that his grand daughter went missing from a day prior. When the victim was recovered her statements under Sections 180 & 183 B.N.S.S. were recorded wherein she had specifically stated that on the date of occurrence she went on her own from her house and reached at Hathras Railway Station, thereafter, she called the applicant on phone and went to Mathura, thereafter, Mumbai, thereafter they returned to Mathura and soelmnized marriage in a temple, thereafter, they also went to Delhi, they also lived together as husband and wife and physical relations were also developed between them on

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 40104 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam