Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-11-28

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 40049 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 40049 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 40049 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 40049 of 2025 Nitin Sharma @ Neetu .....Applicant(s) Versus State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sangeeta Shukla, Sushil Kumar Chaturvedi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 68 HON'BLE ASHUTOSH SRIVASTAVA, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Arimardan Yadav, learned AGA for the State-Respondent and perused the record. The present bail application has been moved on behalf of accused-applicant seeking enlargement on bail in Case Crime No. 578 of 2025, under Sections 115(2), 309(4), 317(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and Section 3/25 of Arms Act, Police Station Sadar, District Agra. Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the accused-applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case crime number. Learned counsel for the applicant further submits that the applicant is not named in the FIR and his name surfaced during the course of investigation. He submits that no incriminating material has been recovered from the possession of the applicant. He submits that there is no independent witness of the alleged incident. He submits

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 40049 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam