CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 38053 of 2025 at Allahabad

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 38053 of 2025 Raju .....Applicant(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ajay Kumar Vashistha Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Sandeep Kumar Pathak Court No. - 65 HON'BLE DR. GAUTAM CHOWDHARY, J. 1. List revised. None appears for the informant. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record. 2. It has been argued by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. Learned counsel further submits that by the efflux of time, trial began and during the trial, the statement of P.W.1-victim was recorded and she has not supported the prosecution version, copy of which statement is annexed as Annexure-7 to the affidavit accompanying the bail application. He thus submits that no offence against the applicant is made out. Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applicant have also been placed before the Court. The circumstances which, according to the counsel, led to the false implication of the