Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-11-10

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 36502 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 36502 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 36502 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 36502 of 2025 Aarif .....Applicant(s) Versus State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Manoj Kumar Tripathi, Vinod Kumar Tirpathi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 65 HON'BLE DR. GAUTAM CHOWDHARY, J. 1. Sri Saurabh Tripathi and Sri Shantanu Srivastava, learned counsel have filed their power on behalf of the informant today in the Court, which is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for the informant, learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant has contended that the incident is alleged to have taken place on 10.04.2024 whereas the F.I.R., has been lodged on 12.09.2025 without there being any plausible explanation of delay of more than one year and four months. Learned counsel further argued that the victim has levelled of commission of rape against the applicant in the F.I.R., as well as in her statements recorded under Section 180 and 183 of BNSS and also the applicant threatened her to viral her obscene video. Learned counsel further contends that the applicant was doing job at Saudi A

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 36502 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam