CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 26787 of 2024 at Allahabad

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 26787 of 2024 Monu .....Applicant(s) Versus State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Deepak Kumar Verma, Raghuvansh Chandra, Ram Jee Saxena Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Sharda Prasad Mishra, Subhash Chandra Maurya Court No. - 65 HON'BLE DR. GAUTAM CHOWDHARY, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record. 2. It has been argued by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. Learned counsel further submits that by the efflux of time, trial began and during the trial, the statement of P.W.1 and P.W.2, were recorded and they have not supported the prosecution version, copy of their statements are annexed as Annexure-RA1 to the rejoinder affidavit. He thus submits that no offence against the applicant is made out. Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applicant have also been placed before the Court. The circumstances which, according to the counsel, led to the false implication of the accused have