Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-11-11

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 18222 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 18222 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 18222 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 18222 of 2025 Monu Alias Pawan Chauhan .....Applicant(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Navin Kumar Pandey, Umesh Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 65 HON'BLE DR. GAUTAM CHOWDHARY, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that though the victim in her statement recorded under Section 183 BNSS has made specific allegation against the applicant for committing her rape, but at the trial the victim (P.W.1) in her testimony has not made any allegation of rape against the applicant and she has not supported the prosecution case, which statement has been filed as Annexure No. S.A.1 to the supplementary affidavit dated 28.10.2025, which is on the record. Further it has also been submitted that grandfather as well as mother of the victim have also not supported the prosecution case at the trial and they have also been declared hostile. Thus, it is argued that there is bleak chance that prosecution may prove its case beyond reasonable doubt a

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 18222 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam