CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 16949 of 2025 at Allahabad

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 16949 of 2025 Anshu .....Applicant(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rajeev Kumar Saxena Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 65 HON'BLE DR. GAUTAM CHOWDHARY, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record. 2. It has been argued by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. Learned counsel further submits that the victim had gone with the applicant out of her own free will and consent. He further submits that the victim is aged about 18 years according to the ossification test, copy of which is annexed as Annexure-1 to the compliance affidavit. Learned counsel further argued that the victim in her statement recorded under Section 183 of B.N.S.S.,. has stated that the applicant sniffed hanker chief on account of which, she became unconscious and had committed rape. She has also stated that the applicant had forcibly married her and took her to Himachal and had kept her at his sister-in-law (Bhabhi) house where he committ