Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-11-27

CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 682 of 2020 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 682 of 2020 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 682 of 2020 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

Reserved on:24.11.2025 Delivered on:27.11.2025 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 682 of 2020 Gauru @ Gaurav …..Appellant(s) Versus State of U.P. …..Respondent(s) Counsel for Appellant(s) : Abhishek Mayank, Ram Ker Singh, Shashikala Mani Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Court No. - 66 A.F.R. HON'BLE SAMIT GOPAL, J. 1. List revised. 2. Heard Sri Abhishek Mayank, learned counsel for the appellant, Sri Ajay Singh, learned A.G.A.-I and Sri Bade Lal Bind, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. The trial court records have been received which have also been perused. The paper book of the matter has been prepared which is on record and referred to. 3. Notice was issued to the opposite party no. 2 vide order dated 15.3.2023. Office vide its report dated 06.5.2023 reported that notice has been served personally on the opposite party no. 2 as per the report of C.J.M. concerned which is dated 28.3.2023. Service of notice is thus sufficient. Despite service no one appears on her behalf even in the revised list. 4. Name of the prosecutrix/victim is not being disclosed and mentioned in the present judgment in the light of directions of the Apex 2 C

CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 682 of 2020 at Allahabad · Niyam