CHETAN GOYAL AND ORS vs THE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR

Judgment text excerpt

$~26 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: 28.11.2025 ,,,,,,,,,, + CRL.M.C. 8493/2025 & CRL.M.A. 35498/2025 EXEMPTION FROM FILING CERTIFIED COPIES ETC. CHETAN GOYAL AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Manish Sharma, Mr. Vicky Kumar, Mr. Gaurav Gulati, Advs. Petitioners are person through vc versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Nawal Kishore Jha, APP with SI Braham Parkash & ASI Ravinder Tiwari and, P.S.Sultan Puri. Mr. Varun Kumar, Adv. for R- 2. R-2 is present through vc. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA JUDGMENT(ORAL) RAVINDER DUDEJA, J. 1. This is a petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, seeking quashing of FIR No. 290/2021, dated 12.04.2021,registered at P.S Sultan Puri, Delhi under Sections CRL.M.C. 8493/2025 Page 1 of 4 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:VAISHALI PRUTHI Signing Date:29.11.2025 14:10:28 498A/406/34 IPC and all proceedings emanating therefrom on the basis of settlement between the parties. 2. The factual matrix giving rise to the instant case is that the marriage between Petitioner No. 1and Respondent no. 2/complainant was solemnized on 18.04.2019 as per Hindu Rites and ceremonies at Delhi. One child was born out of the said wedlock. However, on account of temperamental differences Petitioner No. 1 and Respondent No. 2 are living separately since 27.03.2020. 3. As per averments made in the FIR, Respondent No. 2 was subjected to physical and mental harassment on account of dowry demands by the petitioners.FIR No. 290/2021 was lodged at the instance of respondent no. 2 at PS Sultan Puri under sections 498A/406/34 IPC against the petitioners. 4. During the course of proceedings, the parties amicably resolved their disputes and the terms of settlem