Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-11-13

CENTRAL WAREHOUSING CORPORATION vs M/S DEEN DAYAL

Citation / case number
FAO (COMM)-107/2024 2025:DHC:9906-DB
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
CENTRAL WAREHOUSING CORPORATION
Respondent
M/S DEEN DAYAL
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: 13.11.2025 + FAO (COMM) 107/2024 & CM APPL. 33366/2024 CM APPL. 33369/2024 CM APPL. 11706/2025 CENTRAL WAREHOUSING CORPORATION .....Appellant versus M/S DEEN DAYAL .....Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case For the Appellant : Mr. Prabhas Bajaj, Mr. Priyanshu Tyagi and Mr. Rithvik Mathur, Advocates. For the Respondent : Mr. Ranjeet Kumar, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR JUDGMENT V. KAMESWAR RAO, J. & VINOD KUMAR, J. 1. This appeal has been filed with the following prayers: “a. Allow the present Appeal and set aside the Impugned Judgment dated 07.02.2024 passed by the Ld. District Judge (Commercial Court), South District, Saket Courts, New Delhi in 2. Before delving into the merits of the matter it is pertinent to give a factual background surrounding the present appeal. The impugned judgment dated 07.02.2024 of the learned District Judge (Commercial Court) (Digital -04) South, Saket Courts, New Delhi had dismissed the Section 34 petition under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (‘the Act’, hereinafter). The appellant had sought setting aside of th