BHOOP SINGH GOLA vs MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI

Judgment text excerpt

$~79 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 18.11.2025 + CM(M) 2208/2025, CM APPL. 72091/2025 & CM APPL. 72090/2025 BHOOP SINGH GOLA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Hunny Singh, Mr. R. K. Sonkiya, Mr. Naveen Kumar and Mr. Sumit, Advocates. versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Shruti Goel, Advocate for MCD. Ms. Manika Tripathy, SC for DDA. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA O R D E R (ORAL) 1. By way of this petition brought under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner/plaintiff has assailed order dated 15.10.2025 of the learned trial court, whereby the application seeking amendment of plaint in the suit pending for thirty years was dismissed. Having heard learned senior counsel for petitioner/plaintiff, I do not find it a fit case to even issue notice. 2. Broadly speaking, in the suit filed for permanent and mandatory injunction to restrain the defendants (respondents herein) from demolishing CM(M) 2208/2025 Page 1 of 4 pages Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA Signature Not Verified GIRISH DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec4 5569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, KATHPALIA postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, Digitally Signed serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d155 70996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e26 fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA By:NEETU N NAIR Date: 2025.11.18 17:01:58 -08'00' Signing Date:18.11.2025 17:14:46 any portion of the subject property, the petitioner/plaintiff at the stage of rebuttal final arguments filed an amendment application, seeking to amend seven paragraphs of the plaint and the prayer clause by inserting the expression “defendant no.2” therein. Further, it appears that prior to th