Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-11-13

BHAI MANJIT SINGH HUF & ORS. vs PUNIT BERIWALA

Citation / case number
FAO(OS)-20/2022 2025:DHC:10009-DB
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
BHAI MANJIT SINGH HUF & ORS.
Respondent
PUNIT BERIWALA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 13.11.2025 FAO(OS) 20/2022 and CM APPL. 15311/2022 BHAI MANJIT SINGH HUF & ORS. .....Appellants Through: Mr. T.K. Ganju, Sr. Adv. and Mr. Raj Shekhar Rao, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Ekansh Mishra and Ms. Anupriya N. Verma, Advs. for Appellant No.1. Mr. Shohit Chaudhry, Adv. for Appellant No.2. versus PUNIT BERIWALA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Trideep Pais, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Sahiba Singh, Ms. Sakshi Jain, Ms. Saloni and Mr. Dilip Garg, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR J U D G M E N T (ORAL) ANIL KSHETARPAL, J. 1. The Defendants (Appellants herein) assail the correctness of the order dated 07.02.2022 passed by the learned Single Judge [Impugned Order], wherein the learned Single Judge dismissed an oral prayer for rejection of the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [hereinafter referred to as „CPC‟]. 2. In October, 2021, the Plaintiff (Respondent herein) filed a suit for specific performance of agreement to sell, possession and injunction, while alleging that the Defendant No.2, who was „Karta’ of the Defendant No.1, entered into an agreeme