ARUN KUMAR vs SUBHASH CHAND & ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 17th November, 2025 CS(OS) 234/2023 with I.A. 6925/2023, I.A. 26018/2023, I.A. 4080/2024, I.A. 6502/2024, I.A. 37245/2024 & I.A. 38252/2024 ARUN KUMAR .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Arun Kumar, Plaintiff through VC. versus SUBHASH CHAND & ORS. .....Defendants Through: Mr. Mahmood Hasan, Md. Shoaib Mahmood and Ms. Nazia Khan, Advocates for D-1 and D-2. Mr. Amit Mishra, Advocate for D-6. D-6 present-in-person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL AMIT BANSAL, J. (Oral) I.A. 26018/2023 (u/O-VII Rule 11 of the CPC) 1. The present application has been filed under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter ‘CPC’) on behalf of the defendants no.1 and 2 seeking rejection of plaint. 2. Notice in this application was accepted by the plaintiff appearing in person on 22nd January 2024. 3. Reply has been filed on behalf of the plaintiff. 4. The present suit has been filed inter alia seeking reliefs of declaration and partition of the movable properties including gold articles and vehicles 5. The defendants no.1 and 2 are the plaintiff’s father and mother respectively and the defendants no.3 to 5 are his sisters. T