Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-11-21

APPEAL UNDER SECTION 37 OF ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT 1996 No. 89 of 2023 at Lucknow

Citation / case number
APPEAL UNDER SECTION 37 OF ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT 1996 No. 89 of 2023 at Lucknow
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
APPEAL UNDER SECTION 37 OF ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT 1996 No. 89 of 2023 at Lucknow
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPEAL UNDER SECTION 37 OF ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT 1996 No. - 89 of 2023 Ranil Nair .....Appellant(s) Versus Commercial Court No. 2 , Lko. and another .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Appellant(s) : Ashok Kumar Singh, Radhika Singh, Satjyot Chawla Dang Counsel for Respondent(s) : Akber Ahmad, Gaurav Mehrotra, Pritish Kumar, Utkarsh Vardhan Singh Chief Justice's Court HON'BLE ARUN BHANSALI, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE JASPREET SINGH, J. 1. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that on account of passage of time, the appeal has been rendered infructuous, inasmuch as the application under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 filed by the appellant was dismissed and the agreement, against revocation whereof the said application was filed, itself has come to an end by efflux of time on 31.03.2024. 2. None is present for the appellant in the revised list as well. 3. It appears that the appellant has lost the interest in the appeal, the same is, therefore, dismissed for want of prosecution. (Jaspreet Singh, J.) (Arun Bhansali, CJ.) November 21, 2025 Harshita/P.Sri. Digitally signed by :- HARSHITA High Court of Judicat

APPEAL UNDER SECTION 37 OF ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT 1996 No. 89 of 2023 at Lucknow · Niyam