Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-11-13

ANKUR KOHLI AND OTHERS vs THE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR

Citation / case number
CRL.M.C.-8039/2025 2025:DHC:9938
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
ANKUR KOHLI AND OTHERS
Respondent
THE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR

Judgment text excerpt

$~76 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: 13.11.2025 ,,,,,,,,,, + CRL.M.C. 8039/2025 & CRL.M.A. 33597/2025EXEMPTION FROM FILING CERTIFIED COPIES ETC., CRL.M.A. 33598/2025 DELAY 153 DAYS IN RE-FILING OF PETITION. ANKUR KOHLI AND OTHERS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Manish Kumar Pathak, Ms. Jemini Jaiswar, Advs. along with petitioners in person. versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Satinder Singh Bawa, APP with SI Sanjeeta, PS Mukherjee Nagar. Mr. Deepak Jain & Ms. Shanu Khan, Advs. for R-2 along with R-2 in person. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA JUDGMENT(ORAL) RAVINDER DUDEJA, J. 1. This is a petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, seeking quashing of FIR No. 266/2011, dated 18.07.2011, registered at P.S Mukherjee Nagar, Delhi under Sections 498A/406 IPC and all proceedings emanating therefrom on the basis of settlement between the parties. CRL.M.C. 8039/2025 Page 1 of 4 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:VAISHALI PRUTHI Signing Date:14.11.2025 11:32:32 2. The factual matrix giving rise to the instant case is that the marriage between Petitioner No. 1 and Respondent no. 2/complainant was solemnized on 12.11.2009 as per Hindu Rites and ceremonies at Delhi. One Child was born out of the said wedlock. Due to temperamental differences Petitioner No. 1 and Respondent no. 2 have been living separately since 19.01.2012. 3. As per averments made in the FIR, Respondent No. 2 was subjected to physical and mental harassment on account of dowry demands by the Petitioners. Chargesheet has since been filed under sections 498A/406 IPC against the Petitioners. 4. During the course of proceedings, the parties amicably resolved their disputes and the terms of the compromise were redu

ANKUR KOHLI AND OTHERS vs THE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR · Niyam