Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-11-28

ANJAR ALI KHAN AND ORS. vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

Citation / case number
W.P.(C)-9556/2018 2025:DHC:10764-DB
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
ANJAR ALI KHAN AND ORS.
Respondent
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

Judgment text excerpt

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: 20th AUGUST, 2025 Pronounced on: 28th NOVEMBER, 2025 IN THE MATTER OF: + W.P.(C) 9556/2018 ANJAR ALI KHAN AND ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Rajat Arora, Mr. Niraj Kumar, Mr. Sourabh Mahla, Advocates. Mr. Rajesh Kumar Singh, Advocate for Petitioner-3. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Prasanta Varma, SCGC along with Ms. Richu Advocate and Insp. Prahlad Devendra + W.P.(C) 9620/2018 JAIY PRAKASH SHAU .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajesh Singh, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Arti Bansal, SPC, Ms. Shruti Goel, Advocate + W.P.(C) 1517/2020, CM APPL. 5290/2020 SUMIT KUMAR SINGH & ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Rajat Arora, Mr. Niraj Kumar, Mr. Sourabh Mahla, Advocates. Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed W.P.(C) 9556/2018 etc. Page 1 of 21 By:RAHUL SINGH Signing Date:02.12.2025 16:38:36 versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Gigi C George SPC, Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate. Mr. R L Meena, Dy Commandant and Mr. S K Bharti, CISF CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIMAL KUMAR YADAV JUDGMENT SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J. 1. The instant writ petitions have been filed challenging the termination orders issued to the Petitioners in W.P. (C) No. 9556/2018, W.P. (C) No. 9620/2018and W.P. (C) No. 1517/2020,by their respective commandants. 2. Since all the three writ petitions involve a common challenge, this Court shall dispose them by way of a common judgment. For the sake of convenience, the three Petitioners in W.P. (C) No. 9556/2018, one in W.P. (C) No. 9620/2018 and the nine petitioners in W.P. (C) No. 1517/2020 shall be collectively referred to as “Petitioners,” unless the context otherwise requires. For furth

ANJAR ALI KHAN AND ORS. vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. · Niyam