ANIL NAGPAL vs STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

$~24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: 21.11.2025 ,,,,,,,,,, + CRL.M.C. 8298/2025 ANIL NAGPAL ....Petitioner Through: Mr. Aditya Rathree, Ms. Riya Kalra and Mr. Aakash Khatri, Adv. Petitioner in person versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR … Respondents Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP with SI Laxman, ASI Sushil, PS- Naraina. Mr. Puneet Mahendra Adv. for R-2 Respondent No. 2 in person. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA JUDGMENT(ORAL) RAVINDER DUDEJA, J. 1. This is a petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, seeking quashing of FIR No. 294/2022, dated 17.07.2022, registered at P.S Naraina, Delhi under Sections 279/427 IPC and all proceedings emanating therefrom on the basis of settlement between the parties. CRL.M.C. 8298/2025 Page 1 of 4 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:VAISHALI PRUTHI Signing Date:21.11.2025 18:19:50 2. On 17.07.2022 at around 08:25 AM, petitioner crashed/collided his car (HR 26 DB 4995) to car of respondent no. 2 (DL 7 CL 0012) from behind, causing damage to his car. FIR 294/2022 was lodged at the instance of respondent no. 2 under sections 279/427 IPC against the petitioner. Chargesheet has since been filed under the same sections whereas charges have been framed only under section 279 qua the petitioner. 3. During the course of proceedings, the parties amicably resolved their disputes and Respondent no. 2 has provided his No Objection Affidavit dated 18.11.2025, copy of which is part of the digital record. 4. Parties are physically present before the Court. They have been identified by their respective counsels as well as by the Investigating Officer SI Laxman, from PS Naraina. 5. Respondent No. 2 confirms that the matter has been amicably settled with the petitioner without any