AMIT SEHGAL vs RAJESH SANDHYANA

Judgment text excerpt

$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 28.11.2025 + CM(M) 38/2024 & CM APPL. 7984/2024 AMIT SEHGAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Tejas Mehta, Advocate (through videoconferencing) versus RAJESH SANDHYANA .....Respondent Through: None. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA O R D E R (ORAL) 1. Petitioner has assailed order dated 16.11.2023 of the learned commercial court, whereby application of the petitioner/plaintiff (filed at the stage of final arguments) under Order VII Rule 14 CPC and under Order XVIII Rule 3 CPC for permission to file additional documents was dismissed. I have heard learned counsel for petitioner/plaintiff but none appears on behalf of the respondent and since the predecessor bench had directed the learned trial court to hear final arguments but not to pass orders, I find no reason to adjourn the matter awaiting counsel for respondent. 2. Broadly speaking, it appears that in the suit for recovery of money, the petitioner/plaintiff at the stage of final arguments filed the application for permission to place on record additional documents, taking the ground that the petitioner/plaintiff is asthmatic patient and at the time of filing the suit, invoices of transactions between the parties for the period from 01.04.2018 CM(M) 38/2024 Page 1 of 3 pages Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA Signature Not Verified GIRISH DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afe c45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, KATHPALIA postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d1 5570996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff80 Digitally Signed 1e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2025.11.28 18:09:35 -08'00' By:NEETU N NAIR Signing Date:28.11.2025 18:19:04 onwards along with ledger account were