AMIT SEHGAL vs RAJESH SANDHYANA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 28.11.2025 CM(M) 38/2024 & CM APPL. 7984/2024 AMIT SEHGAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Tejas Mehta, Advocate (through videoconferencing) versus RAJESH SANDHYANA .....Respondent Through: None. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA O R D E R (ORAL) 1. Petitioner has assailed order dated 16.11.2023 of the learned commercial court, whereby application of the petitioner/plaintiff (filed at the stage of final arguments) under Order VII Rule 14 CPC and under Order XVIII Rule 3 CPC for permission to file additional documents was dismissed. I have heard learned counsel for petitioner/plaintiff but none appears on behalf of the respondent and since the predecessor bench had directed the learned trial court to hear final arguments but not to pass orders, I find no reason to adjourn the matter awaiting counsel for respondent. 2. Broadly speaking, it appears that in the suit for recovery of money, the petitioner/plaintiff at the stage of final arguments filed the application for permission to place on record additional documents, taking the ground that the petitioner/plaintiff is asthmatic patient and at the time of filing the suit, invoices o