Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-11-04

AJMERA RAMULU vs B CHANDRAKALA

Citation / case number
MAT.APP.(F.C.)-148/2024 2025:DHC:9657-DB
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
AJMERA RAMULU
Respondent
B CHANDRAKALA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on: 24.09.2025 Judgment pronounced on:04.11.2025 MAT.APP.(F.C.) 148/2024, CM APPL. 25296/2024, CM APPL. 35808/2025, CM APPL. 50365/2025 and CM APPL. 50366/2025 AJMERA RAMULU .....Appellant Through: Mr. Manoj Singh, Adv. versus B CHANDRAKALA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Akshat Bajpai, Mr. Shobhit Trehan and Ms. Jayashree Mishra, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR JUDGMENT ANIL KSHETARPAL, J. 1. Through the present Appeal filed under Section 19 of The Family Courts Act, 1984 [hereinafter referred to as „the Act‟], the Appellant assails the correctness of the judgment dated 09.02.2024 [hereinafter referred to as „Impugned Judgment‟] passed by the learned Family Court. 2. The Appellant preferred an application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, seeking rejection of the Respondent‟s petition under Section 13(1)(i)(b) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 [hereinafter referred to as 3. In order to comprehend the issues involved in the present case, the relevant facts, in brief, are required to be noticed. 4. The Appellant/Husband is employed as an Assistant Executive Enginee

AJMERA RAMULU vs B CHANDRAKALA · Niyam