Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-11-15

ABP PVT LTD vs ITC HOTELS LTD & ORS

Citation / case number
FAO(OS)-288/2016 2025:DHC:10039-DB
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
ABP PVT LTD
Respondent
ITC HOTELS LTD & ORS

Judgment text excerpt

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on: 30.10.2025 Judgment pronounced on: 15.11.2025 + FAO(OS) 288/2016, CM APPL. 37142/2016 and CM APPL. 37143/2016 ABP PVT LTD .....Appellant Through: Mr. Darpan Wadhwa, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Arijit Mazumdar, Ms. Riya Dhingra, Mr. Amer and Mr. Bhaskar Anand, Advs. versus ITC HOTELS LTD & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Adv. with Mr. L.K. Bhushan and Ms. Raashi Beri, Advs. + FAO(OS) 27/2017 and CM APPL. 3223/2017 ABP PVT LTD .....Appellant Through: Mr. Darpan Wadhwa, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Arijit Mazumdar, Ms. Riya Dhingra, Mr. Amer and Mr. Bhaskar Anand, Advs. versus ITC HOTELS LTD & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Adv. with Mr. L.K. Bhushan and Ms. Raashi Beri, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR JUDGMENT ANIL KSHETARPAL, J. 1. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the present Appeals, filed by the Appellant against the same Respondents, arising from two different interlocutory orders passed by the Court in the same suit, shall stand disposed of by this Judgment. Signature Not Verified Signed By:JAI NARAYAN Signing Date:17.11.2025 FAO(OS) 288/2016 and connected matter Page 1 of 7 11:09:13 2. In FAO(OS) 288/2016, the Appellant assails the correctness of an order dated 03.08.2016 [hereinafter referred to as „Impugned Order dated 03.08.2016‟] passed by the learned Single Judge, while dismissing its application under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [hereinafter referred to as „CPC‟]. 3. In FAO(OS) 27/2017, the Appellant assails the correctness of an order dated 10.01.2017 [hereinafter referred to as „Impugned Order dated 10.01.2017‟], while refusing the stay the proceedings under Sect

ABP PVT LTD vs ITC HOTELS LTD & ORS · Niyam