Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-05-12

WRIT - C No. 4333 of 2025 at Lucknow

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 4333 of 2025 at Lucknow
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 4333 of 2025 at Lucknow
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:27686-DB Court No. - 1 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 4333 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sanjay Sharma Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sarjoo Ram,Aklavya,Chandan Prasad,Manish Kumar Shrivastav,Prashant Shekhar,Ravi Kant Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Attau Rahman Masoodi,J. Hon'ble Ajai Kumar Srivastava-I,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner is unable to substantiate the right to compensation as claimed in the present writ petition. Learned Standing Counsel, on the other hand, has also denied the existence of any such scheme under which such compensation would be admissible to the petitioner. That being the position, the writ petition, being wholly misconceived, is rejected. (A. K. Srivastava-I,J.) (A. R. Masoodi,J.) Order Date :- 12.5.2025 Mahesh Digitally signed by :- MAHESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

WRIT - C No. 4333 of 2025 at Lucknow · Niyam